The Superman reboot highlights DC movies mess — here’s how they can be fixed
The Superman reboot highlights DC movies mess — here's how they tin be fixed
Last weekend, Warner Bros announced that a brand-new Superman motion picture was in the works from author Ta-Nehisi Coates and producer JJ Abrams. But this isn't a sequel to Homo of Steel starring Henry Cavill; this is a reboot, featuring a unlike histrion as the Last Son of Krypton.
Coates said that it was an laurels "to exist invited into the DC Extended Universe," which raises some questions. The DCEU is the name used for the shared movie universe that began with Man of Steel, which we'll next see again in Zack Snyder's Justice League. Movies exterior of that continuity, similar Joker and the upcoming Batman reboot, aren't supposed to exist role of the aforementioned continuity.
- How to watch the Snyder Cut
- How to sentry the DC movies in lodge
At first glance, the Coates quote suggests that the new Superman will have place in the existing shared universe. Then again, that was supposed to exist the case with Matt Reeves' The Batman — until last summertime, when DC Films President Walter Hamada confirmed that information technology was not a DCEU movie.
Are you confused all the same? We are. This news has reminded usa just how messy the DC movies actually are.
It wasn't e'er like this
Think back to the far-off days of summer 2013. Homo of Steel had only come out, and was successful enough that Warner Bros. decided to make a sequel. A year earlier, The Avengers had demonstrated that the shared moving-picture show universe model could work, grossing over $1 billion dollars at the box role.
Warner Bros. put plans in movement for the fledgling "Homo of Steel 2" to feature Batman and kickstart DC's own shared universe. The company even announced an ambitious DC movies slate, stretching from all the mode to the twelvemonth 2020. It was a simpler time.
Then Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice hit theaters in 2016, receiving a lukewarm reception, and underperforming at the box office. Subsequently on that year, Suicide Squad arrived to about universal criticism. Things quickly began falling autonomously, and DC'south plans for its movies quickly spiraled out of control.
Cut to today, and things are very messy. Of DC'due south original slate of nine post-Batman-5-Superman movies, just five saw the light of twenty-four hours. Of those movies, only one has been successful plenty to already take a sequel (Wonder Woman). Another (Suicide Squad) performed so badly that it was a miracle that it managed to get a sequel at all. (Well, technically a soft reboot, which is simultaneously a sequel and non a sequel. Considering this wasn't confusing enough already.).
There are also 21 other films in various stages of development, including the Superman reboot. Some of them are original movies, while others are sequels or spin-offs. We have to assume that these movies will be office of the DCEU continuity until nosotros hear otherwise. But they don't necessarily accept to be.
Todd Phillips' Joker movie, starring Joaquin Phoenix as the title character, was originally supposed to be a spin-off starring Jared Leto. Likewise, the aforementioned The Batman was originally a DCEU prequel movie starring Ben Affleck.
Only which movies are which?
The biggest issue hither is that nosotros have no way of knowing which movies are which. Exercise you need to see Suicide Team to understand Joker? Absolutely not, and it's probably better than you don't. Are y'all going to walk out of The Batman and wonder why in that location are extras wearing Superman and Wonder Woman outfits because you assumed Robert Pattinson and Ben Affleck were the same iteration of Batman, who shouldn't exist enlightened of the other superheroes at this point in time? Of course not.
Audiences aren't stupid, and are completely capable of realizing that these movies are not related to each other. Similarly, they won't struggle to understand what's going on if Superman ends upwardly being played by a Black actor in the new movie, equally fans accept speculated.
Simply Warner Bros. could do a much improve job of telling us what'south what. Which movies are canceled? (the Nightwing pic has had no updates since 2018.) Which movies are and aren't going to be function of the same continuity? (Joker and The Batman.)
If annihilation, that makes now the perfect time to resurrect an idea Todd Phillips pitched back during the development of Joker: Bringing the DC's Blackness Label comic imprint to the big screen.
Warner Bros. wasn't on board at the time, and Phillips has since said that in that location'due south no reason for Warner Bros. to go to the trouble of creating a whole new cinematic make. Only I completely disagree.
DC Black Label Movies could be something fresh
For those who don't know, Black Label is a DC imprint that handles more mature comic stories. These books are typically standalone stories outside mainstream DC canon, although older comics have as well been reprinted nether the label - like comics from the now-defunct Vertigo banner.
When yous see a story with the DC Black Label logo, you lot know two things: This comic is non for kids, and it's non going to affect the ongoing series that DC publishes each week.
Frankly information technology's the perfect style to differentiate different DC movies on the large screen. It wouldn't necessarily have to target adult audiences — that's what R ratings are for — but it can nonetheless be used to make better sense of DC's ever-growing movie slate.
With reboots of Batman and Superman on the way, now's the time to get in happen. Joker made over a billion dollars at the box part and in the process received critical acclaim and several prestigious awards. The flick even netted Joaquin Phoenix an Oscar for best actor. Joker proved that a standalone movie tin can notwithstanding work in a world where every DC movie has some sort of linked continuity.
We don't fifty-fifty have to wait that long to put such a thing into place. We're a year away from the release of The Batman, starring Robert Pattinson equally the Dark Knight. Y'all will find that he is not Ben Affleck, and it'southward been confirmed that this is a totally unlike iteration of the character. The Batman is the perfect candidate to try out a new branding experiment.
Whether the movie succeeds or fails, what better time to launch something new and fresh than with a Batman moving-picture show? Some people might non understand what this whole deal is, but requite information technology some fourth dimension, and I believe people will come around. Afterward all, fans eventually realized that just because a motion-picture show has a Marvel logo at the first, it'south not necessarily in the MCU.
Y'all simply need Warner Bros to be consistent with the marketing. Marvel has continually pushed the shared universe in its films, no matter how expert or bad the concluding product was. Whereas Warner Bros has a history of backpedalling to attempt course right at the kickoff sign of problem. Suicide Squad is the all-time example of this, since the studio fabricated all-encompassing belatedly-production changes to the cut in response to some of the criticisms leveled at Batman v Superman.
What I'm saying is that should Warner Bros go down the road of bringing the Black Label to its movies, it needs to play the long game. Every new idea faces hurdles along the manner, and the only way to guarantee failure is to requite in to them.
Whether a new make volition actually clear upward the messy DC pic universe is another thing entirely. That's pretty much down to Warner Bros. itself to sort out. But as any comics fan knows, DC comics continuity is an unholy mess also. If anything, it'due south not surprising that the movies are going downward the same path.
Source: https://www.tomsguide.com/news/the-superman-reboot-highlights-dc-movies-mess-heres-how-they-can-be-fixed
Posted by: hoytjusbabyes.blogspot.com
0 Response to "The Superman reboot highlights DC movies mess — here’s how they can be fixed"
Post a Comment